Well, I'm all flushed and flustered. After a weekend where I returned to sanity about Mister Man (that will be his name--the one with the lover previously referred to as "super-cutie") I sat next to him this morning and there was all that energy flow crackling between us again.
I sense he returned somewhat to sanity as well over the weekend, and is probably questioning the logic of encouraging in me or in himself anything at all. At the same time he clearly enjoyed the attention. I'll just have to play this one by ear--it's not as if it makes too much difference whether we "decide" to take a step back or not. It's hard to imagine the pheromones suddenly not flowing, and when they flow, we react.
Funny, there's an advantage to the absence of gay marriage. If I was a straight man or woman, writing about this intense flirtation with a married man or woman, I would come off as a slut or a predator, and he or she as faithless. I probably wouldn't even write about it. And yet we know darn well that it happens between straight people all the time. Somehow, even an attached gay man is still technically single, he has no vows for me to disregard or him to dishonor--well no public ones. In Mister Man's case, their agreement is "Don't Ask, Don't Tell." How many married couples (in this country) ever reach that stage of evolution? Probably more than we think, but it's still a very private agreement, because there's not a lot of social support for it. Such a premium is placed on fidelity--as if once you love and commit to one person, wanting another somehow invalidates the initial relationship. How many basically good partnerships have broken up because they refused to overlook something secondary on the side?
Though admittedly, as a logistical matter, its hard to love two people at once. My friends A. and S. finally just invited I. into their relationship, and all three of them are still together 7 years later. I can't really imagine having more than one significant other on an ongoing basis, but I also can't imagine sleeping or loving (that way) just one man for the rest of my life. Of course I wouldn't mind someone being faithful to me, and vice-versa, but to me it only has meaning as a freely-given gift--not something done because it's a rule. If someone I'm with is going to be thinking of someone else when we are together, go be with him and get it out of your system, for crying out loud. And if you can't, perhaps that's who you should be with.
One thing about gay men is that even if they agree to be faithful, they never expect each other to not be attracted to anyone else. Woman might be able to do that, but men are incapable of it. (That Elizabeth Whatshername on The View seems to think women should expect it from their men--isn't she just irritating on all counts? I guess The View feels obligated to have some completely unexceptional Republican everywoman type represented. I can't stand her.)
Ironically, tonight I volunteer for the Marriage Equality people again--data input. Before that, this afternoon I go to Warner Bros. studios to do the French dialogue with the actors. It's so cool to be "on the lot" for work--as opposed to because you have a friend who works there and has invited you to a screening, or to take a tour.
MCO 2006

